Understanding types.
- Daniel Clyne
- Aug 3, 2022
- 1 min read
The last part (the previous post on paradox resolutions) was similar to the scientific distinction between 'actual value’ and ‘measurement value’.
that overlap in many areas cognitively.
We could evaluate Aristotelian causes similarly as types of understanding. With an ‘actual value’ as much as a ‘measurement value’ and expand them to the following:
→[ cause
[ ] structure / form
X composition/material composition
] → effect
|---| measurement
.<--->. Relationship (Category or Part, for example)
Combinations, for example:
[x] – Structure + composition
X→[ material cause
These could be very useful.
A distinction may occur between physical and non-physical understandings. One proof through environmental correspondence and the other?
All of these could be part of a bedrock logic or rational system. !!!