top of page
Search

Understanding types.

  • Writer: Daniel Clyne
    Daniel Clyne
  • Aug 3, 2022
  • 1 min read

The last part (the previous post on paradox resolutions) was similar to the scientific distinction between 'actual value’ and ‘measurement value’.

that overlap in many areas cognitively.


We could evaluate Aristotelian causes similarly as types of understanding. With an ‘actual value’ as much as a ‘measurement value’ and expand them to the following:


→[ cause

[ ] structure / form

X composition/material composition

] → effect

|---| measurement

.<--->. Relationship (Category or Part, for example)


Combinations, for example:

[x] – Structure + composition

X→[ material cause


These could be very useful.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
On realism and idealism:

I have the feeling that too much realism can sometimes tend towards unfairness, and also sometimes nihilistic and cynical belief systems....

 
 
 
Knowledge types

“Reification in knowledge representation is the process of turning a predicate or statement into an addressable object. Reification...

 
 
 
For long-term happiness...

From what I've read and experienced: For long-term happiness cognitive (and brain chemical) resting and recharging is required. As well...

 
 
 

2 Comments


Daniel Clyne
Daniel Clyne
Aug 08, 2022

A distinction may occur between physical and non-physical understandings. One proof through environmental correspondence and the other?

Like

Daniel Clyne
Daniel Clyne
Aug 03, 2022

All of these could be part of a bedrock logic or rational system. !!!

Like

©2022 by Daniel Clyne. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page